- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has rejected pleas challenging the sale of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) to JSW Steel Ltd, effectively allowing the latter to acquire the bankrupt steel maker.The NCLAT had to decide about whether to remove the stay on the Rs 19,700-crore bid by JSW Steel or if the company could be granted immunity under Section 32A of...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has rejected pleas challenging the sale of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) to JSW Steel Ltd, effectively allowing the latter to acquire the bankrupt steel maker.
The NCLAT had to decide about whether to remove the stay on the Rs 19,700-crore bid by JSW Steel or if the company could be granted immunity under Section 32A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) which provides immunity to the new management of a distressed company acquired under the law.
JSW Steel had moved the NCLAT seeking immunity from future litigation after Bhushan Power was booked for alleged accounting frauds, which had led to seizing of assets by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
After the NCLAT sought an explanation from the ED, the investigation agency argued that Section 32A would not apply to JSW Steel.
Incidentally, Bhushan Power faces an investigation by various investigative agencies, after the Punjab National Bank (PNB) and Allahabad Bank reported a fraud amounting to Rs 5,500 crore by the steel company’s erstwhile promoters.
It may be recalled that Bhushan Power & Steel was among 12 companies identified by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in its first list of big loan defaulters in June 2017. The RBI had directed banks to refer these cases to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and initiate insolvency proceedings against them.