- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has reserved its judgment on JSW Steel's acquisition of the insolvent Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL).A bench headed by NCLAT Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya concluded its hearing on several petitions over BPSL's takeover.JSW Steel had moved the appellate tribunal seeking immunity against future litigation due to...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to ![Legal Era](/images/logo.png)
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has reserved its judgment on JSW Steel's acquisition of the insolvent Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL).
A bench headed by NCLAT Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya concluded its hearing on several petitions over BPSL's takeover.
JSW Steel had moved the appellate tribunal seeking immunity against future litigation due to alleged fraud by former BPSL promoters.
The development comes around three months after the NCLAT ordered a freeze on payment by JSW Steel.
The bench will decide whether to remove the stay on the Rs 19,700-crore bid and if JSW Steel can be covered under the new amendment of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code which grants immunity to the new management of a distressed company from proceedings against the former promoters.
In October 2019, the NCLAT had put JSW Steel's payment to acquire BPSL on hold and asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to release BPSL's attached properties. The NCLAT had also asked the ED not to attach any more property of BPSL without its permission.
The ED, which is investigating alleged fraud committed by the debt-laden firm's previous management, had attached the assets of BPSL, which it believes to be from proceeds of crime.
In an affidavit filed before the NCLAT, the ED has opposed JSW Steel's immunity in the BPSL matter.