• Legal Era India
  • Legal Era Global
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
search-icon

Top Stories

HomeNews
22 Nov 2022 5:15 PM GMT

NCLAT stays CCI imposed penalty against OYO

By: Nilima Pathak
NCLAT stays CCI imposed penalty against OYO

NCLAT stays CCI imposed penalty against OYO The low-cost hotel chain group was fined Rs.169 crores The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has admitted the petition of OYO challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposing a fine against the company. The bench led by Justice Rakesh Kumar admitted the appeal following OYO, a low-cost hotel chain...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


NCLAT stays CCI imposed penalty against OYO

The low-cost hotel chain group was fined Rs.169 crores

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has admitted the petition of OYO challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposing a fine against the company.

The bench led by Justice Rakesh Kumar admitted the appeal following OYO, a low-cost hotel chain group, depositing a 10 percent of the total penalty of Rs.16.9 crores.

The case pertains to the complaints filed against MakeMyTrip India-Ibibo (MMT-Go) by the Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (FHRAI), a representative body of the hospitality industry in India, and two budget hotel brands FabHotels and Treebo Hotels.

The complainants claimed that MMT-Go had required price parity in its contracts with hotel partners. It prohibited the hotel partners from selling their rooms for less than what they charged on MMT-Go's platform at other online travel agencies or on their own portals.

The hotel owners cited that MMT-Go indulged in predatory pricing by offering rooms at less than the average rate. It was offering huge discounts to customers, forcing out smaller travel portals.

Thus, CCI initiated an investigation against MMT-Go and OYO. In October, the trade regulator levied a penalty of Rs.223.5 crores on MMT-Go for abusing its dominant position in the online travel booking space and entering into an anti-competitive tie-up with OYO. The competition watchdog also levied Rs.169 crore penalty on OYO.

It had further directed MMT-Go to modify its agreement with hotels to remove the price and room availability parity obligations with other online travel portals. The commission ordered both companies to deposit the penalty within two months.

Aggrieved by the order, OYO filed a suit before NCLAT to seek interim relief.

The tribunal stated that OYO's petition required a hearing and the CCI records the matter by the end of January 2023. The tribunal also granted liberty to the counsels of both parties to complete the pleadings, which must be concluded before the first week of February 2023.

The matter is set for a hearing in April 2023.

Nilima Pathak

Nilima Pathak

Next Story
TAGS:
  • National Company Law Appellate Tribunal 
  • Justice Rakesh Kumar 
  • OYO 
  • MMT-Go 
  • Competition Commission of India 
  • MakeMyTrip India-Ibibo 
Similar Posts
Trending Now
Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2023© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X