- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Ahmedabad bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has rejected a proposal by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries’ plans to consolidate its subsidiaries, as per which the drug-maker had sought to demerge an overseas unit.However, after the NCLT’s rejection of its proposal, Sun Pharma can be expected to challenge the Ahmedabad bench’s ruling in higher...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Ahmedabad bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has rejected a proposal by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries’ plans to consolidate its subsidiaries, as per which the drug-maker had sought to demerge an overseas unit.
However, after the NCLT’s rejection of its proposal, Sun Pharma can be expected to challenge the Ahmedabad bench’s ruling in higher courts.
The company had approached the NCLT to approve transfer investment of undertakings from Sun Pharma to its Netherlands-based wholly-owned subsidiary.
According to a Sun Pharma spokesperson, the purpose of the demerger proposal is to consolidate the holding structure for Sun Pharma’s overseas, direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Incidentally, it may be noted that Sun Pharma has been consolidating its businesses lately. In December 2018, it completed the demerger of the specified business of Sun Pharma Global FZE (Sun FZE) and its merger into Sun Pharmaceutical Industries.
Significantly, the NCLT’s stand on Sun Pharma’s demerger proposal could also put a question mark on similar restructuring proposals of Indian companies, especially since several of them have sought consolidation to help raise funds for their overseas subsidiaries.