- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
[ By Bobby Anthony ]A Maharashtra-based NGO, the Minority Front, has moved a plea in the Supreme Court challenging the July 31, 2019, notification on the National Population Register (NPR).The petition filed through advocate Ejaz Maqbool has stated that “It is relevant to note that these rules provide for preparation of NRC and for issuance of a National Identity Card to those persons...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
A Maharashtra-based NGO, the Minority Front, has moved a plea in the Supreme Court challenging the July 31, 2019, notification on the National Population Register (NPR).
The petition filed through advocate Ejaz Maqbool has stated that “It is relevant to note that these rules provide for preparation of NRC and for issuance of a National Identity Card to those persons whose names have been entered in the National Register of Citizens (NRC)."
The petitioner has sought a direction from the Supreme Court to declare the notification as unconstitutional.
The petitioner has contended that Rule 4 (3) and Rule 4 (4) provide the reason for the preparation of the Population Register, and the data collected in the Population Register shall be verified and scrutinized by the local registrar and if the particulars of any individual were found doubtful, a remark shall be made on the register.
“Subsequently, the person would be given an opportunity of hearing post which, it shall be decided whether the concerned person's name would be included in the NRC,” the petition has stated.
Therefore, the plea stated that preparation of the Population Register is not only the first step, but a precondition to prepare the NRC, since it is on the basis of the data collected during the exercise that doubtful citizens are to be identified.
“The Population Register is prepared only to aid in the exercise of preparation of the final NRC is evident from the text of the impugned NPR notification which excludes Assam from its purview as the NRC exercise in the state of Assam has already been concluded,” the petition has stated.
The petition has cited the central government’s policy decision to not go ahead with the NRC, and seen against this backdrop, the preparation of the Population Register is nothing but a waste of time, energy and valuable resources of the country.