- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has upheld the right of Reliance Home Finance’s lenders Nippon India Mutual Fund and Credit Suisse to sell the shares of Reliance General Insurance, following the invocation of a pledge.It may be recalled that earlier the Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority (IRDAI) had declared the enforcement pledge as invalid.However,...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has upheld the right of Reliance Home Finance’s lenders Nippon India Mutual Fund and Credit Suisse to sell the shares of Reliance General Insurance, following the invocation of a pledge.
It may be recalled that earlier the Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority (IRDAI) had declared the enforcement pledge as invalid.
However, the SAT stated that after identifying a buyer for Reliance General Insurance, the proposed owner will have to be certified fit and proper by IRDAI, which will carry out a due diligence and ascertain the prospective buyer’s financial soundness.
Nippon India MF and Credit Suisse are likely to invite bids for Reliance General Insurance, whose shares are held by IDBI Trusteeship. Current foreign direct investment norms prohibit non-residents from owning more than 49% in an insurer.
Nippon India and Credit Suisse argued before SAT that they enforced the pledge in accordance with the share pledge agreement to safeguard their interest and not to take control of the company. It was also argued by Nippon India that it cannot manage any other business apart from mutual funds, as per SEBI norms.
The case dates back to March 2018, when Reliance Home Finance issued bonds worth Rs 400 crore and Rs 1,200 crore to Nippon India and Credit Suisse respectively.
After Reliance Home Finance defaulted on its debt obligations, Nippon India and Credit Suisse invoked the pledge (of Reliance General shares) made by Reliance Home Finance’s promoter, Reliance Capital.
Later, in November 2019, the Delhi High Court prevented Reliance Capital from selling any of its assets.