- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
SC dismisses SBI plea; refuses to vacate Delhi HC stay on IBC proceedings against Anil Ambani
After State Bank of India (SBI) approached the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court order, which had stayed the IBC proceedings against Anil Ambani in connection with the Rs. 1,200 crore loan disbursed by SBI to two of Ambani's firms, the Top Court refused to vacate the stay granted by the High Court on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) proceedings against Ambani.Last month,...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to 
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

After State Bank of India (SBI) approached the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court order, which had stayed the IBC proceedings against Anil Ambani in connection with the Rs. 1,200 crore loan disbursed by SBI to two of Ambani's firms, the Top Court refused to vacate the stay granted by the High Court on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) proceedings against Ambani.
Last month, the Delhi High Court had stayed the personal insolvency proceedings against Anil Ambani under Part III of the IBC and directed him to not transfer and dispose of any assets. SBI had invoked the personal guarantee that was furnished by Ambani.
A Bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhat declined to vacate the stay. However, the Court gave SBI the liberty to seek a modification of this stay order from the Delhi High Court and said that the matter may be taken up by the Delhi High Court on October 6.

