- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
SEBI Circular Sets New Rules, Lists Factors Which Could Affect Applicant Claim For Confidentiality During Resolution Process
[ By Bobby Anthony ]A recent circular issued by the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has set various grounds on the basis of which applicants could be assured of confidentiality while filing a plea under the settlement mechanism.The capital markets regulator also listed factors which could adversely affect applicants’ claims for confidentiality.The circular stated that SEBI...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
A recent circular issued by the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has set various grounds on the basis of which applicants could be assured of confidentiality while filing a plea under the settlement mechanism.
The capital markets regulator also listed factors which could adversely affect applicants’ claims for confidentiality.
The circular stated that SEBI may assess the information given by the applicant, as well as the assistance or co-operation rendered during examination proceedings by considering various factors such as nature of assistance provided and the gravity of the matter.
The capital market regulator would also assess whether the co-operation was provided before the applicant had knowledge of any pending proceedings, before deciding about the applicant’s claim for confidentiality.
Also assessed would be other factors like whether the provided information was truthful, complete and reliable, the SEBI circular stated.
According to the circular, while recognizing the gravity of matter, factors like nature and type of defaults under the securities laws, age of applicant, repetitive nature of defaults and the effect of defaults on investors would also be considered.
The SEBI circular also laid down the grounds for rejection of confidentiality stating that the history of securities laws' violations by the applicant, and the plausibility of reasons for the applicant to delay reporting of violations of securities laws, among other factors, would be taken into account.