- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
SEBI Recommends Direct Arbitration For Repetitive And High-Value Complaints
SEBI Recommends Direct Arbitration For Repetitive And High-Value Complaints
It will improve the Online Dispute Resolution system in the Indian securities market and make it more efficient
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed a mechanism to directly send certain disputes for arbitration instead of first going through conciliation.
The capital markets regulator explained that complaints involving financial claims of Rs.10 crore or above, and repetitive in nature, must go straight to arbitration. This would help in resolving long-standing and complex disputes faster.
It held that cases directly referred for arbitration include those filed by specific institutions, recovery claims made by trading members, matters where both parties agree to arbitration, and legal or time-barred issues identified early in the process.
However, if a party chose not to go for arbitration, the case would be closed in the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) portal. The entity could still pursue it through other legal channels.
SEBI also advocated that settlements reached through conciliation should be accepted electronically and be legally binding.
Additionally, the ODR institutions must maintain separate panels for conciliators and arbitrators, ensuring that one person does not serve in both roles. The professionals would be evaluated annually to maintain the quality of dispute resolution.
While streamlining the process, SEBI suggested that all market infrastructure institutions (MIIs) and ODR institutions should jointly prepare a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the ODR system.
This SOP would provide step-by-step guidance on lodging complaints – documents required, handling repetitive or invalid complaints, and the responsibility of every entity during different stages, like pre-conciliation, conciliation, and arbitration.
It would include rules for recording proceedings, payment of fees, enforcement of arbitration awards, and actions to be taken against participants breaking the norms.
SEBI added that the document would be available online and reviewed every year to keep it updated.
It has invited public comments on these proposals until 12 May.



