- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Securities & Exchange Board Of India Slaps Fines On ICRA, CARE For Failure To Flag Poor Financial Health Of IL&FS
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has slapped rating agencies ICRA and CARE with a fine of Rs 25 lakh each for “vivid and obvious” failure to flag the poor financial health of IL&FS, which collapsed, sparking off a liquidity crisis in the country.Both ICRA and CARE were given 45 days each to pay the total amount of penalty for their failure to exercise...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has slapped rating agencies ICRA and CARE with a fine of Rs 25 lakh each for “vivid and obvious” failure to flag the poor financial health of IL&FS, which collapsed, sparking off a liquidity crisis in the country.
Both ICRA and CARE were given 45 days each to pay the total amount of penalty for their failure to exercise due diligence while discharging their responsibilities as credit rating agencies.
“Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and exercising the powers conferred upon me under Section 15I of the SEBI Act read with rule 5 of the Adjudication Rules, I hereby impose a penalty of Rs 25 lakh on the Noticee viz. ICRA Limited under Section 15HB of SEBI Act,” adjudicating officer Santosh Shukla said. A similar order has been issued against CARE as well.
However, the orders, highlighted that “though there is no allegation of any mala fide on the part of ICRA and CARE, the failure by the rating agencies is blameworthy and serious considering the degree of responsibility bestowed upon them by the statute”.
“Further, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the default occurred due to lethargic indifference and needless procrastination and laxity of ICRA and CARE,” the orders noted.
It was also noted that considerable reliance of investors and regulators on opinion of credit rating agencies as hallmark of creditworthiness of the issuer and the rated instruments clearly outweigh any kind of lack of due diligence by the credit rating agencies.