News

September 19, 2019

Supreme Court Reserves Order On Central Government Plea Challenging Delhi High Court Order In Gautam Khaitan Case


[ By Bobby Anthony ]

Gautam-Khaitan

The Supreme Court has reserved its order on the central government’s plea challenging a Delhi High Court order which had ruled that the black money law cannot have a retrospective effect, that is, it cannot be applied prior to April 1, 2016, as fixed by the parliament.

On May 16, the Delhi High Court had passed the order preventing the government and the Income Tax (I-T) Department from initiating any punitive measure against businessman Gautam Khaitan under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.

The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra stated that it has to give some prima facie opinion, otherwise the High Court order could be used in other matters.

However, the Supreme Court has also indicated that, prima facie, it will set aside the Delhi High Court order that restrained action against the AgustaWestland scam-accused Khaitan under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act.

The Supreme Court said that trial and proceedings against Khaitan should continue as per law.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that the offence alleged against Khaitan is a continuing offence.

Mehta also that Khaitan had never disclosed his foreign income and assets despite the general one-time window provided by the government for people to make voluntary disclosure of their foreign income and assets.

The Delhi High Court had restrained the Centre and the I-T Department from taking any action against Khaitan on May 16.

The Supreme Court vacation bench, headed by Justice Mishra and including Justice M R Shah, had issued a notice to Khaitan asking him to reply within six weeks.

In May, the central government had moved the Supreme Court challenging a Delhi High Court order, which ruled that the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act cannot have a retrospective effect prior to April 1, 2016, as fixed by Parliament.

On May 16, the Delhi High Court passed the order preventing the government and the Income Tax department from initiating any punitive measure against Khaitan.

Challenging his arrest, Khaitan had submitted before the court that the Act on black money was notified by the central government before the Act itself became operational.

The Enforcement Directorate had arrested Khaitan on January 26 for allegedly depositing money in offshore accounts.

The Delhi High Court had stated, “... at this stage we are prima facie of the considered view that, the official respondents could not have exercised powers granted to it under the provisions of Sections 85 and 86 of the said Act, prior to the enactment itself coming into force, in terms of the provisions of sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the said Act”.

The Delhi High Court had queried the central government on the retrospective applicability from July 2015 of the black money law enacted in April 2016 to take into consideration undisclosed foreign income and assets.

Khaitan had informed the court that under the Act unnecessary action has been initiated against him for assets which did not exist before the law came into force.

Related Post

latest News

  • Another young ex-judge hired into private practice by Luthra to deliver ‘full service from all angles’

    Ex-judicial magistrate from Jharkhand, Kanchan Jasmin Toppo, has been hired as a senior associate by L&L Partners (formerly Luthra & Luthra).

    Read More
  • Biocon and Mylan win patent litigation over Insulin Glargine in US

    Biocon and its partner Mylan have won a patent lawsuit in the United States initiated by Sanofi in relation to formulation patents covering insulin Gl...

    Read More
  • Gujarat HC Advocates’ Body To File Writ Petition In Supreme Court Against Delay In Appointing Justice Kureshi As MP HC CJ

    The Gujarat High Court Advocates’ Association (GHCAA) plans to file a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, in the Supreme Co...

    Read More
shares