- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Tatas May Move SC Vacation Bench To Stay NCLAT Order To Reverse Status Of Company From Private To Public Limited
[ By Bobby Anthony ]Tata Sons may move the vacation bench of the Supreme Court for a stay against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order to reverse its status from a private company to a public limited company.The same order had also reinstating Cyrus Mistry as a director on its board and on three group firms.The Tata Group may not wait until January 6, 2020, since the...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Tata Sons may move the vacation bench of the Supreme Court for a stay against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order to reverse its status from a private company to a public limited company.
The same order had also reinstating Cyrus Mistry as a director on its board and on three group firms.
The Tata Group may not wait until January 6, 2020, since the Supreme Court would reopen only after the winter break.
Meanwhile, there are also reports that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) will examine whether proper procedures were followed by Tata Sons and the Mumbai office of the Registrar of Companies (RoC) before the firm’s status was converted from a public company to a private limited company.
It may be recalled that in September 2017, Tata Sons had secured shareholders’ approval for conversion to a private limited company.
At that time, such a conversion, under Section 14 of the Company Law, required approval of the Tribunal before approaching the RoC.
However, the law was changed with effect from November 2, 2018, delegating those powers to the central government.