- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Taxation tribunal deletes addition for unexplained cash credit
Taxation tribunal deletes addition for unexplained cash credit incriminating material found during the search operations The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition for unexplained cash credit, as it was not based on incriminating material found during the course of search operations. The assessee had raised a pertinent legal ground to submit...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to 
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Taxation tribunal deletes addition for unexplained cash credit
incriminating material found during the search operations
The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition for unexplained cash credit, as it was not based on incriminating material found during the course of search operations.
The assessee had raised a pertinent legal ground to submit that the impugned additions (as made in the assessment order) were not based on any incriminating material found during the search operations. And this being the non-abated year, the additions were not sustainable in law.
The assessee refuted the allegations of the assessing officer (AO) by submitting that except for the statement, there was no evidence in support of the allegation. The sole reliance on the statement was contrary to the specific directions of the Central Board of Direct Taxation (CBDT).
The assessee further stated that his statement was taken under coercion and stress. Therefore, it was not a valid statement in the eyes of law.
The Coram of judicial member C N Prasad and accountant member Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ruled, "There is no incriminating material in the case of the assessee that would show that the transactions under consideration were sham and there was any connection/nexus between the assessee and the group entities.


