- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Trilegal Successfully Represented ACME Solar Holding
Trilegal successfully represented ACME Solar Holding, obtaining stay from the Supreme Court on payment and recovery of transmission charges by renewable power developers.
Trilegal represented ACME, a solar power developer, in proceedings challenging the levy and recovery of transmission charges by the Central Transmission Utility of India (CTU). As per the prevailing regulatory regime, renewable power producers are exempt from payment of transmission charges for the entire term of the Project. However, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity held that ACME was not entitled to this exemption for the period of mismatch when the transmission asset was ready but there was a delay in commissioning of the generation asset by ACME.
It was argued that the delay in commissioning the generation asset by ACME was on account of force majeure events, being the Order dated 19.04.2021 passed by the Supreme Court in the Great Indian Bustard matter wherein all transmission lines in identified areas of Rajasthan were mandatorily to be undergrounded. Reliance was placed on statutory Orders passed by the Ministry of Power under the Electricity (Transmission Planning) Rules, 2021, which provided that no transmission charges can be imposed if the Scheduled Commissioning Date of the generation project has been extended by the competent authority.
Agreeing with the submissions, the Supreme Court restored the earlier interim protection that had been vacated by the Appellate Tribunal. Thereby implying that ACME, being a solar power developer, is exempt from payment of transmission charges.
This Order underscores the significance of the promotion of renewable energy in India and reaffirms the principle that the levy of transmission charges ought to be aligned with the commissioning of Projects.
The Order impacts all renewable energy players in the country, specifically 38 GW of projects which are planned to be commissioned in 2025 and are facing similar challenges for payment of transmission charges on account of a mismatch between the commissioning of the generation assets and transmission assets.
The Trilegal team was led by Disputes Partner Vishrov Mukerjee, comprising attorneys Girik Bhalla, Senior Associate, and Priyanka Vyas, Associate.