The single-judge bench stated that the defendant tried to defraud the public

Puts aside litigation that lasted almost a decade

Expects the Central Board of Direct Taxes to apprise officials to act perceptively

It was hearing a set of medical negligence-related appeals filed under the Consumer Protection Act

Decreases amount from 15 percent to 8 percent, as the case involved 11 years

States that divisional application under Patents Act is maintainable if plurality of invention is disclosed in the claims

Emphasizes there’s no legal compulsion and the person may have reservations about not providing such details

Sets aside the order of the high court and restores the trial court order

States it is contrary to Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Notes that the respondent raised certain technicalities merely to delay the execution of the award

As per the report of the local commissioner, the company garnered a profit of Rs.18-19 lakh from selling fakes

States that it was a pure business expense, hence, deductions were allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.