- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal provides succor to a Chennai bank Karur Vysya Bank allowed Income Tax deduction on education cess In a major relief to the Karur Vysya Bank, the Chennai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the bank a deduction in the education cess. The appellant, a private sector bank, had filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for the Assessment...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal provides succor to a Chennai bank
Karur Vysya Bank allowed Income Tax deduction on education cess
In a major relief to the Karur Vysya Bank, the Chennai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the bank a deduction in the education cess.
The appellant, a private sector bank, had filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The return was, subsequently, revised. The issue pertained to the deductibility of education cess and secondary and higher education cess.
The assesse filed a petition for admission and argued that the issue highlighted in the petition was purely legal and could be raised at any stage of proceedings including appellate proceedings before the Tribunal.
On the other hand, the revenue department strongly opposed the petition. It claimed that the assesse had failed to prove the fact of all relevant materials available before the assessing officer (AO).
Citing an earlier decision by the Bombay High Court, ITAT said that it was a fact that the assesse had taken the issue for the first time by filing an additional ground and the said claim was not before the AO at the time of the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the issue needed to go back to the file of the AO, who was directed to reconsider the issue in accordance with the law.