- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Estee Lauder sues Jo Malone and Zara in UK court for trademark infringement
Estee Lauder sues Jo Malone and Zara in UK court for trademark infringement
The company claimed the fragrance entrepreneur had earlier signed a legal agreement not to use her name
New York-based cosmetics giant Estee Lauder Companies has filed a lawsuit in the UK court against British tycoon Jo Malone, her fragrance brand, ‘Jo Loves’, and Zara, for using Malone's name on certain products.
In 1999, Estee Lauder bought Malone's self-named perfume brand and the rights to use her name. Malone left the company in 2006 and, in 2011, launched a new fragrance label, ‘Jo Loves’.
Estee Lauder complained that the use of ‘Jo Malone’ on the packaging of ‘Jo Loves’ fragrances sold by Zara was the basis of the lawsuit.
Amidst contract breach over trademark infringement, Zara's UK website displayed product descriptions of the ‘Jo Loves Collab’ fragrances comprising the words, ‘Created by Jo Malone CBE, founder of Jo Loves’.
The US company alleged that the name also appeared on the product packaging. However, it was not clear when Zara began selling products bearing Jo Malone's name.
The spokesperson for Estee Lauder claimed that Malone had agreed with the company not to use ‘Jo Malone’ in certain commercial contexts, including the marketing of fragrances. He added, “Ms. Malone's use of ‘Jo Malone’ in connection with recent commercial ventures goes beyond that legal agreement.”
Thus, Estee Lauder had sued Jo Malone, her fragrance brand and Zara for breach of contract, trademark infringement and 'passing off’ (misleading consumers into thinking goods or services are those of another company).
The legal pursuit comes at a time when Estee Lauder and other cosmetics companies have been cashing in on an uptick in demand for fragrances led by Gen Z consumers.



