- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
A Peek into the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020
Is the Bill a step in the right direction towards facilitating the operations and growth of companies in India?...The Government of India introduced various economic measures and reforms on May 17th, 2020 as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pursuant to such economic reforms, several amendments to the Indian Companies Act, 2013 (the "Act") have been proposed by the Government for ease...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Is the Bill a step in the right direction towards facilitating the operations and growth of companies in India?...
The Government of India introduced various economic measures and reforms on May 17th, 2020 as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pursuant to such economic reforms, several amendments to the Indian Companies Act, 2013 (the "Act") have been proposed by the Government for ease of doing business for Corporates and other stakeholders. Consequently, the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020 (the "Bill") has been put to the Lok Sabha, (the lower house of the parliament). The Bill is yet to be passed as an act.
The key amendments proposed in the Bill are set forth below:
- Decriminalization and Re-categorization of certain offences
The Bill proposes changes to certain offences in relation totechnical and procedural defaults such as shortcomings in the company's social responsibilities reporting, inadequacies in the board report, filing defaults, delay in holding of annual general meetings which lack any element of fraud or do not involve larger public interest:
- Removal of imprisonment: imprisonment for certain offences has been removed. For instance, to omit the punishment of imprisonment prescribed in Section 68(11) of the Act for non-compliance with procedure for buy-back prescribed under Section 68 of the Act, the rules framed thereunder and the SEBI (Buy-Back of Securities) Regulations, 2018.
- Reduction in fine amount: fine payable in certain offences has been reduced. For instance, the penalty amount of the Significant Beneficial Owner (SBO) prescribed in Section 90 (1) of the Act, the penalty for each day when the default continues is proposed to be reduced from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 1,000, subject to a maximum of Rs. 200,000.
- Removal of the penalty amount: monetary penalty amount under Section 454 of the Act has been removed for default relating to non-compliance of filing of annual returns in the event such non-compliance has been rectified to either prior to or within thirty days of the issue of notice by the adjudicating officer.
In addition, the Bill seeks to extend the applicability of lesser penalties due to non-compliance of the provisions of small companies and one person companies under Section 446B of the Act to thebenefit of Producer Companies and start-ups. The penalties shall be half of the penalties prescribed under the concerned provision(s) for other companies with a cap of Rs. 200,000 for companies and Rs. 100,000 for officers.
- Incorporation of Producer Companies
A new Chapter XXIA has been introduced relating to Producer Companies. This chapter has been introduced for the benefit of farmers and the agriculture, handloom, handicraft and cottage industries. "Producer Company" has been defined as a body corporate having objects or activities specified in Section 378B and registered as a "Producer Company" under the Act or under the previous law i.e. the Companies Act, 1956. The Bill sets out the activities of a company in order for the company to be classified as a "Producer Company". The provisions of the Bill relating to producer companies are similar to those contained in the Companies Act, 1956.
3. Overseas listing of securities: Section 23(3) of the Bill allows Indian public companies to list securities directly on overseas stock exchange in permissible foreign jurisdictions.The central government has been empowered to determine the classes of public companies that may list overseas, classes of securities that may be listed, and the jurisdictions and stock exchanges where listing may be undertaken.
4. Exclusion from the definition of listed company: The Bill empowers the Central Government, in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI"), to exclude companies issuing specified classes of securities from the definition of a "listed company". This applies mainly to companies issuing debt securities.
5. Reduced timeline for rights issue
In orderto speed up the procedure for rights'issue under Section 62 of the Act, the timelines for applying for rights' issues has been reduced from 15 days tosuch lesser number of days as may be prescribedand not exceeding thirty days from the date of the offer within which the offer, if not accepted, shall be deemed to have been declined.
6. Remuneration to non-executive directors
The Act provides for payment of remuneration to executive directors of the company which includes managing director and other full-time directors if the concerned company has inadequate or no profit in a year. The Act does not make provision for payment of remuneration to non-executive and independent directors. Section 197(3) of the Bill proposes to include non-executive directors and independent directors for payment of remuneration as per Schedule V of the Act.
7. Declaration of beneficial interest in shares:
As per Section 89 of the Act, a person holding shares but not having beneficial interest in the company is required to make a declaration to the company. The Bill proposes to exempt such class of persons from complying with these requirements if considered necessary in public interest.
8.Exemptions from filing resolutions:
Under Section 117 (3)(g) of the Act, banking companies are exempted from filing certain resolutions with the Registrar of Companies (ROC). The Bill proposes to extend this exemption to non-banking financial companies and housing finance companies.
9.Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):
Companies which have Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) spending obligation up to Indian rupees 5 million shall not be required to constitute the CSR Committee. The Bill also proposes to allow eligible companies under the Act to set off any amount spent in excess of their CSR spending obligation in a particular financial year towards such obligation in the succeeding financial years. The Bill proposes that in case of defaulting companies due to non-compliance, the maximum penalty should be either twice the amount required to be transferred by the company to the fund or Indian rupees 10 million, whichever is less.
10.Financial Result Filing:
A new Section 129A has been introduced according to which classes of unlisted companies (as may be prescribed by the Central Government)will have to prepare and file periodical financial results and complete the audit or review of such resultswith the Registrar within 30 days from the end of the relevant period.
11. Benches of Appellate Tribunal
The Bill seeks to insert a new Section418A to establish the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT") which shall be in New Delhi. Additional benches of the Appellate Tribunal may also be set upto hear appeals under the Competition Act, 2002 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Conclusion:
In our opinion, the proposed changes would help achieve the intentions of the Government. The major changes to the decriminalization and re-organization of offences would encourage ease of doing business by corporates. This would also de-clog the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). In addition, the applicability of lesser penalties to start-ups and producer companies would definitely reduce the burden of compliance for start- ups and producer companies and facilitate the creation of a more proactive environment for doing business. Another significant change is the setting up of benches of the NCLAT which would help in decreasing the pendency of cases and help in accelerating the settlement of disputes. One might, however, question the proposition that the NCLAT should have jurisdiction to hear appeals under legislation other than the Act.
The inclusion of producer company provisions from the old legislation is another thoughtful change that would provide a boost to companies engaged in the production, marketing and sale of agriculture produce and sale of produce from cottage industries. The proposal for allowing Indian companies to list their shares on overseas stock exchangesis also a proactive change which would enable public listed companies to gain access to foreign jurisdictions for raising capital and thus increase their sources of capital.
All in all, the Bill can be stated to be a big step in the right direction towards facilitating the operations and growth of companies in India.
Mini Raman is a corporate and transaction lawyer with 22 years of experience in M&A, private equity, and venture capital transactions and in general corporate and commercial law. She has represented both investors and the promoters in different instances. She has also represented clients in different industrial sectors such as e-commerce, IT, facilities services, telecom, hospitals, retail etc. She regularly provides expert advise on setting up of businesses and investing into India. She has advised on various funds and companies regularly on complex issues in Indian corporate, commercial and transaction law. Mini holds a bachelor of law degree (LLB) from the University of Pune and a master’s degree in law (LLM) from the University of London. She is a member of the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa. Mini is partner with LexOrbis.
Angelina Talukdar has 4 years of practice mainly in the areas of general corporate and commercial laws. She has assisted various clients in different sectors such as e-commerce, IT facilities services, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies etc. on their early stage investment, employment agreements, non-compete, confidentiality, intellectual property licensing agreements, advertising agreements and privacy policy. She has developed considerable expertise in the areas of privacy and commercial contract laws. Angelina graduated from National Law School of India University, Bangalore and is a member of the Bar Council of Delhi.