- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Legal Era News Network

From Legal Era News Network
Busy Bee Airways Seeks To Acquire Go First, Challenges Liquidation In NCLAT
Busy Bee Airways has challenged the liquidation of Go First in the NCLAT, expressing its willingness to acquire the airline as a going concern. The tribunal will hear the case again on February 10, 2025, while concerns remain about the fate of 5,000 employees.
Madras High Court Dismisses PhonePe's Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against BundlePe
The Madras High Court dismissed PhonePe's trademark infringement lawsuit against BundlePe, ruling that the term "Pe" is a common element in the digital payments sector and cannot be exclusively owned by PhonePe.
Helmy, Hamza & Partners, Baker McKenzie Advised Swiss MEDLOG In Connection With Development Of Dry Port In Egypt
Helmy, Hamza & Partners and Baker McKenzie advised MEDLOG Transport & Logistics on a major public-private partnership to develop a state-of-the-art dry port in Egypt, enhancing the country’s logistics infrastructure and contributing to a more sustainable future.
General Insurance Corporation Hit With ₹138 Cr GST Liability
General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) faces a ₹138 Cr GST liability, following a tax demand from the CGST & Central Excise authorities. The demand relates to alleged tax short payments and Input Tax Credit issues from 2017 to 2021. GIC plans to challenge the order and file an appeal.
Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Faces GST Recovery Demand From Tax Authorities
Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) has been issued a demand order for ₹7.38 crore by tax authorities concerning the non-reversal of CGST input tax credit. The company plans to challenge the order before the appropriate appellate authority.
KLA Advised Aqaseem On SAR 500 Million Sukuk Issuance Programme
KLA advised Aqaseem on a SAR 500 million Sukuk Issuance Programme approved by the Saudi Capital Market Authority, marking a key achievement in Saudi Arabia's corporate and investment banking sector.
Bajaj Auto Receives Rs 10 Cr GST Penalty
Bajaj Auto Ltd. has been penalized over ₹10 crores by tax authorities due to a dispute over the Goods and Services Tax (GST) classification of its instrument clusters.
CESTAT Rules In Favor Of Secure Meters On Classification of Communication Modules
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled in favor of Secure Meters Limited regarding the classification of communication modules used in smart meters, overturning an earlier decision by the Principal Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi.
Delhi High Court Rules In Favor Of Saregama India In Copyright Dispute Over ‘En Iniya Pon Nilave’
The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Saregama India Limited (SIL), affirming its copyright over the iconic Tamil song "En Iniya Pon Nilave." The Court barred Vels Films International from using the recreated version in its movie Aghathiyaa, reinforcing the importance of copyright compliance in the entertainment industry.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Advised Tata Electronics On Obtaining CCI Approval For Acquisition Of Majority Shareholding Of Pegatron India
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Tata Electronics on securing CCI approval for acquiring a majority stake in Pegatron India, strengthening TEPL’s market presence.
Ghadi Granted Permanent Relief In Trademark And Copyright Infringement Case
Ghadi, a detergent manufacturer, was granted permanent relief by the Delhi District Court in a trademark and copyright infringement case against a competitor. The Court issued a permanent injunction and awarded damages after the defendant used a deceptive trademark and tagline that resembled Ghadi's.
The Bombay High Court Sets Aside Registrar’s Refusal For Registration of & 'KHADI PRAKRITIK PAINT' Device Mark
The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Registrar’s refusal to register the "KHADI PRAKRITIK PAINT" device mark. The Court held that the Registrar overlooked the petitioner’s prior registration and emphasized the importance of assessing the mark as a whole.












